According to option (c) i.e, stare decisis, judges in current cases follow whenever possible the interpretation of law determined by judges in prior cases.
<h3>What is meant by the stare decisis principle?</h3>
Stare decisis is Latin for "to hold fast to what has been decided." If a prior court has made a ruling on the same or a closely comparable matter when a court is faced with a legal argument, the court will follow that precedent when making its conclusion.
The principle of stare decisis is upheld largely to promote consistency in justice and consistency in judicial judgments. It aids in the consistent application of the law by both judges and attorneys. It enables the Court to keep a close eye on rulings that deviate from precedent or pose other unsolved issues.
hence, option (c), or stare decisis, states that judges in current cases should, whenever feasible, follow the legal interpretation made by courts in earlier instances.
To learn more about stare decisis refer to: brainly.com/question/24596729
#SPJ4
They encouraged overland trading on the Silk Road. That’s how the Silk Road is an early example of globalization.
Answer:
Increase; not change
Explanation:
If the minimum wages tend to exceed the market clearing wages which is the wages in which the supply of labour equal to the demand for labour the labour supply will increased and the numbers of unemployed workers will definitely INCREASED while the number of the already employed workers will NOT CHANGE it will remain the same because the supply of labour did not equal the demand for labour since the minimum wages has exceeded the market clearing wages.
The numbers of supply has increased leading to the numbers of unemployed workers to increased because their is supply but no demand.
Therefore increased in supply of labour = increased in unemployed workers.
