Substantive disagreement may never be resolved because it leads to clashes of opinions.
A disagreement or argument is said to be substantial if it centers on the presentation of divergent viewpoints regarding the truth or the adherence to opposing ideals.
There must be a means to distinguish substantive disagreement (SD) from conceptual disagreement if legal concepts can be the subject of SD. Arguments that persons debating a certain philosophical problem are only having a linguistic argument are one approach to reject the substantiveness of the issue. For instance, it has been argued that the seeming conflict over the mind/brain identity thesis is only a word one and that there is no real controversy over whether or not mental traits are the same as neurological ones.
To know more about Substantive disagreement refer to:
brainly.com/question/28085499
#SPJ1
Answer:
Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
Explanation:
The answer to your question is: sacrilege
Answer:
National Benchmark Tests
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Answer:
4. representative government
Explanation:
According to my research on the different principles that exist within the American law system, It can be said that based on the information provided within the question, the protesters most likely believe that the government violated the representative government principle. This term is defined as the principle in which officials representing a group of people are elected by those same people. Unlike the situation described within the question where large corporations are seemingly placing people into the government for their benefit.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
