The correct answer is Luminous
Explanation: The mosaics have a very old origin. They were already called mosaics in Crete, Mesopotamia and, as we know, in Greece and Rome.
The Romans built the mosaics with small cubic pieces called tessela. The materials of these tesserae were limestone, stained glass, ceramic.
Paleo-Christian art, now able to enjoy greater financial bases and relegating fresco mural painting to the background, will seek to perfect the technique and will toast the interior of the church with intense and vibrant color images, possible by replacing marble with pieces of colored glass . However, this new material does not allow a complex palette of shades and the modeling of the figures loses their contact with the real world, the characters present themselves as transcendental, immaterial beings, inhabitants of a kingdom of light and gold.
Answer:
They're the birth place of Democracy.
Explanation:
Ancient Greece was considered as the first civilizations that introduced the concept of Democracy.
The building in Ancient Greece was designed to accommodate a lot of audiences facing one specific direction where the speaker can present his/her case. The Roman civilization adopted this building and some principles from Greek's democracy.
American leaders in the past used these concept as a replacement for British' monarchy. They found that mimicking the building can be a source of inspiration that remind them about the core foundation of democratic government.
Answer:Brand dilution.
Explanation:
Brand dilution is the mechanism through which a certain brand is weakened because of its overuse.Brands becomes less meaningful due to using products or items that are not good fit for brand .They lose effectiveness and wort due to unsuccessful brand extension.
According to the question,brand dilution is the issue of the scenario as fruit flavored beverage is an unsuccessful brand extension of the same brand whose dried fruit snack is liked by Marco.This is making him doubtful about the snack also because of ineffective product.Thus,brand lost its power.
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
My answer would be A because during the Stono Rebellion, the<span> militia surrounded the escaping slaves and those who were not killed were captured and executed. This would definitely be a cause of fear in my opinion. </span>
