The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer to this question can be defined as follows:
Explanation:
In the given question the choices were missing so, we define the correct choice only.
The Cornering lights usually include small lights in such a headlight. It also comes on it at low revs or if the steer is moved in a specific direction. The modern vehicles usually will have a fogged lens with a revolving beam.
This kind of headlight will be going through the horizontal direction, and the headlight will become the edge when the driver goes the rear wheel.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Eliminating the options one after the other;
Option A: Economic Feasibility, involves the study of the cost and statistical understanding of the effect such project would have on the economy. this does not conforms with the issues such as political repercussions as stated in the question above, option A is not the best fit.
Option B: Operational Feasibility, involves a study of how well the operation of such project will be of usefulness or how well would it solve the problem, also this does not relate to the question above.
Option D: This option is best fit to the gap above in the question, because is a test to see if it will conform to requirements, so that it does come back as a crime against the law. it relates to the question above, as it involves political understanding and law such as the information privacy Act, that is why it is the best fit to the above question.
Option D: Technical Feasibility only examines or is carried out to see if the technical functionality will match the requirement needed.
Answer:
d) inactives
Explanation:
In Verbe and Nie's classical study of political participation, inactive among communalists, campaigners, voting specialists, activists, and parochial participants, are a political class that rarely participate in political activities the form of voting, campaigns, or political discussions .
According to piaget, the ability to think logically about events first develops during the : concrete operational stage
According to piaget, most people entered this stage during middle childhood, when kids are starting to able to create a logical conclusion abouts specific event
