Answer:
Explanation:Last Friday was a big day for voting rights in the United States. Federal courts struck down restrictive voting laws in Kansas and Wisconsin. And in a particularly important decision, the fourth circuit court of appeals delivered a stinging rebuke to North Carolina’s egregious vote suppression law. As the court observed, North Carolina legislators didn’t even try to hide the core purpose of the law: to stop African Americans from getting to the polls.
The politics of North Carolina are a perfect illustration of what led the Republican party to nominate Trump. The southern state, which has seen a large influx of people into its prosperous urban centers, is becoming more liberal – Barack Obama carried the state in 2008, and Mitt Romney carried it by only two points in 2012. North Carolina Republicans have not reacted to these trends, however, by becoming more moderate.
The clash between a Republican party running at full speed to the right while its population was trending to the left led North Carolina to pass a particularly terrible anti-voting law. In 2013, a bare majority of the US supreme court gave the green light to North Carolina by striking down a provision of the Voting Rights Act that required states, such as North Carolina, that had a history of discrimination to preclear electoral law changes with the Department of Justice.
In addition to a requirement that voters show particular forms of ID, the state eliminated Sunday voting, narrowed the window for early voting and eliminated same-day vote registration and early registration for 16- and 17-year olds. Voter ID requirements at least have the superficial appearance of addressing the integrity of elections, although in practice the justification is bogus. But most of the provisions in North Carolina’s attack on the right to vote had no purpose, even in theory, other than to make it harder for people to vote.
Answer:
Communism has been successful in the eyes of working class and poor people. But not if the eyes of rich people. A lot of communist countries have been successful. Although it has been successful, a few factors have made it especially hard for communism to reach its full potential. Communism is international. Without a majority of the worlds economy based on "people over profit" as socialism tries to do. So, yes. Communism is successful but it has a few flaws.
Industrial Revolution
Industrial Revolution, is the process of transition from an agrarian and manual economy to one characterized by industry and machine manufacturing.
Over the years there have been a series of industrial revolutions. Below are a list of the for industrial revolutions
- First Industrial Revolution: Coal in 1765
- Second Industrial Revolution: Gas in 1870
- Third Industrial Revolution: Electronics and Nuclear in 1969
- Fourth Industrial Revolution: Internet and Renewable Energy in 2000
One similar impact of the industrial revolution in Europe and Latin America is rapid urbanization which involved the movement of people to cities. This made the rural ares less populated than the urban areas.
Learn more about the industrial revolution at brainly.com/question/546336
Nobody gets refused Health care under the affordable health care act and they also take people with preexsisting conditions like cancer and diabetes
Raw Materials is the answer
