I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
I believe the answer is: Ethnocentricity.
ethnocentricity refers to the act of seeing our own culture as inherently superior compared to another culture. This often make people seeing the norms or tradition that exist in other culture by using our own as a standard. The more their culture deviate from ours, the more inferior we think their culture to be.
the answer is a because an absolute monarchy is NEVER considered to be democratic because it is where one ruler of royal blood has all the power and the people don't get a say
Answer:
I think this is about you not about is so you have to ask your mind about your hobbies and ambition .
Explanation:
Everybody have their own things bro...
Answer:
B. an action, an event, a circumstance or an actual thing done
Explanation:
A fact is an action,an event,a circumstance or an actual thing done. A fact is also a thing that is known or proved to be true.
