Lots of them lost their husbands and some got really hurt
Answer:
Question 1: Actually, he did not. If he did export and spread the ideals of the Revolution, why did he appoint his brothers and other people to high points in government? Apart from that, they held the position of kings and monarchs which is opposite to the ideals of the Revolution. It should be that the people have the right to decide for themselves but they didn’t. Instead, they lived in fear and rebelled against him.
Question 2: Both revolutions started rather moderately, with people demanding more representation in government. Neither gained the full support of everyone in the respective nations either, as evidenced by Loyalists in the US and counterrevolutions in areas like the Vendee in France. In France, the revolution became more radical and ideological, taking Enlightenment ideals and rationalism to the extreme. The revolution in France also led to the dictatorship of Napoleon and the restoration is Bourbon monarchs, so ultimately a return to the status quo, while the American Revolution was successful in gaining American independence. Furthermore, the French Revolution was fought in France while the American Revolution was fought in the colonies of England and never sought to completely depose George III, just remove his control of the colonies.
<span>To rally support for American involvement in the war
</span>
For both WW that the USA was involved in, the administration of Wilson and Roosevelt most daunting task was to convince the American public, which was sharply pacified on the need to join the war.
<span></span>
The best description in terms of how a parliamentary democracy differs from a presidential democracy would be that "<span>C) In a presidential democracy, political power is shared between state and federal governments," since in a Parliamentary government it is more based on districts. </span>
