Answer:
The correct option here is A) .
Explanation:
In the given small open economy , if government increase the government purchases than people in the economy will have more or increased money supply, so when the rates are fixed , in the short run , the income will rise with exchange rates remaining same. Thus option A is definitely correct as money supply would be increased to keep exchange rates fixed and augmenting the effects of government spending on income.
Answer:
The answer is b. Up to $4 million.
Explanation:
It is critical to recognize that $3 million already spent on developing the product is the sunk cost, which is irrelevant cost that should not be included in the budget further spend for the new product.
As the new product is expected to generate a revenues of $4 million, the further cost should be spent on the new product development should not be exceeded the $4 million.
Thus, the answer is b. Up to $4 million is the correct choice.
Answer: Yes
Explanation: Especially in today's time where so many business have to rethink how they look at customer service. Along with the constant growth and change in society, finding a niche can be as simple as keeping up with the changes going on in society. For example, a five star restaurant that is known for it's great dining experience is one way to have a food business. With more people staying home, a small business that creates a 5 star dining experience for home could be a great niche.
Answer:
The consumer surplus in the market for gasoline is $250 million
Explanation:
Consuemr Surplus
It is the difference between the consumer is willing to pay for the commodity and the actual market price.
The consumer surplus can be calculated as follow
Consumer Surplus = 0.50 x ( Maximum Price - Market Price ) x Quantity
Where
Maximum Price = $6.00
Market Price = $3.50
Quantity = 200 million gallons
Placing values in the formula
Consumer Surplus = 0.50 x ( $6.00 - $3.50 ) x 200
Consumer Surplus = $250 million
Note: The graph in the question was missing, it is attached for your reference.
Answer:
$679,700
Explanation:
I believe Mickelson is the person preparing the books for Indigo Inc.
This question tests your knowledge of revaluation and its application to financial statements. It indirectly checks your knowledge of depreciation also.
A quick definition of terms would make it clearer.
Depreciation is the systematic allocation of the price of an asset over its useful life. That is once an asset (non-current) is purchased, it cannot be used up immediately in one financial year, hence accountants usually want to spread the use of the asset and match it with whatever revenue they get from the use of the asset (an application of prudence concept).
But land does not depreciate, rather it appreciates over time. Due to the fact that land appreciates over time, it would be misrepresentation on the part of Mickelson to report the value of the asset in December 2017 at the price in which the land was purchased in 2000.
Because land appreciates over time, a revaluation is more appropriate. this revaluation compares the carrying value of the land with the fair value on the land as at the date of revaluation (comparing $418,200 with $679,700) and the higher is used.
Hence to faithfully represent the current details of the status of the land, the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) states that the entity should record the value of land at fair value.
I hope this is clear and easy to understand.
Other concepts you might want to check out are;
depreciation
carrying amount
revaluation surplus
fair value
