Answer:
The statement is describing the usual difference in trade policy that exists between monarchies and republics.
Explanation:
The excerpt comes from the Spirit of the Laws, by Montesquieu, who was a French philosopher who promoted republicanism and liberalism.
In the text, Montesqueiu is explaining than in monarchies, trade is very restricted, and is usually only allowed for luxury goods like perfums, spices, or silk clothes, because these goods are used by the nobility as a symbol of their power and status.
In monarchies, for the rest of the population, trade is restricted. The common people therefore cannot access goods from abroad, or can only do so at a very high cost.
In republics, Montesquieu says, trade tends to be more open. Merchants become the ones who do most of the trade, guided by their economic ideas. The merchants therefore obtain many goods from abroad, that both the nobility and the commoner can acquire for a lower price.
In conclusion, Montesquieu is using the argument for trade as another reason to support republics over monarchies.
Answer:
Likely "A"
Explanation:
It was often thought that only the "higher-ups" of society should vote.
Answer:
the third one because its not an opinion
A) historian
An archaeologist may find it but a historian would study it
Answer:
The "separate but equal schools" were unfair because they were never actually equal
Explanation:
Amenities for black were always way worse than amenities for whites. Rusted water fountains, dirty bathrooms, not always getting a good quality education, etc.., so they were separate, but never really equal.
