Answer: The Non Compete is NOT Enforceable.
Explanation:
An Agreement not to compete with your previous company is a RESTRICTIVE covenant that was generally introduced to ensure that Upper and Middle Management who were generally privy to Trade Secrets in an Organization do not take that information somewhere else and use it against that old company usually in exchange for better compensation packages.
Hernandez joined Access Organics and regrettably was not given a pay increase or any other special considerations. This is very relevant.
For a Non-compete to hold relevance especially if it is signed AFTER an employee has already being working in an organization, there needs to be SUFFICIENT Considerations that gave the employee better terms such as more job security or better benefits as a result of signing said agreement.
Andy Hernandez received no such benefits in return for signing the agreement and so the Non-compete Agreement lacks said Sufficient Considerations.
The Non-compete is therefore NOT ENFORCEABLE.
It is worthy of note that in the actual case, the Judge ruled in favor of of Andy Hernandez.
If you require further clarification do react or comment.
The return of equity will increase. Businesses can finance
themselves with debt and equity capital. By aggregating the quantity of debt
capital kin to its equity capital, a company can increase its return on equity.
The way in which rising financial leverage increases ROE is a
little less instinctive. One way to think about it is that if a business
adds debt, its assets increase for the reason that its
cash inflows from the debt issuance and so does its
entire debt.
You can make sure to connect only to networks you are familiar with, and never enter your personal data online.
Answer:
He could afford to spend $133,411 for the device now.
Explanation:
The maximum the surgeon could afford for the device is equal to the sum of present value of the lawsuit costs that he can avoid in year 2 and year 5 which is:
+ Year 2: 600,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 600,000 * 10% = $60,000;
+ Year 5: 1,350,000 * %out-of-pocket cost for the law suit = 1,350,000 * 10% = $135,000.
=> The amount he can afford for the device = 60,000 / 1.1^2 + 135,000 / 1.1^5 = $133,411.
So, the answer is $133,411.
When an investor performs an investigation while considering the acquisition of a property, this is referred to as Due diligence.
<h3>what is
Due diligence?</h3>
The systematic analysis and reduction of risk associated with a business or investment decision are known as due diligence.
Any stock can be thoroughly investigated by an individual investor utilizing easily accessible public information.
Numerous additional investment types can be made using the same due diligence method.
A company's financials are examined, compared over time, and benchmarked against rivals as part of due diligence.
Numerous other situations call for due diligence, such as checking a prospective employee's background or reviewing customer feedback.
In order to lower risk exposure, due diligence is primarily used. The procedure makes sure that each party understands the specifics of a transaction before agreeing to it.
To know more about due diligence refer to :
brainly.com/question/17188570
#SPJ4
