In Gideon v. Wainwright the court referred to the sixth amendment when deciding that Gideon’s rights had been violated. Option B is an appropriate response.
What is the significance of the Sixth Amendment?
The Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to an unbiased jury, the right to a public trial without undue delay, the right to counsel, and the right to know the identity of your accusers as well as the specifics of the allegations and supporting documentation.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court upheld Gideon's right to legal representation in both federal and state courts. After the judgment, Gideon was given a second chance to defend himself and was found not guilty.
Hence, Option B is an appropriate response.
To learn more about Gideon v. Wainwright
brainly.com/question/3555290
#SPJ1
Items can be dissolved faster when adding heat in the process, when the size of particle is small but the surface area is very large in the process, when stirring is used to mix the solution or to increase the rate of reaction.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
All the above methods are correct and useful to increase the dissolving rate of items in a process or reaction. By increasing heat the rate of reaction increases gradually because the heat provides energy to the molecules and force them to leave the shell and react rapidly.
When having a large surface area the dissolving time gradually decreases because the size of the particle is comparatively smaller. Stirring helps in mixing the solution due to which the molecules reacts fast and the item’s reaction and dissolving time gradually decreases.
Yes, this is correct.
Crucially, this is only the case if everything else stays equal: so if the quality of the product stays the same and if the income of the buyers doesn't decrease.
Then with a lower prize, more items will be purchased - and less if the prize increases.
Based on the thoughts of Keven, we can infer that this is a<u> hasty generalization fallacy. </u>
<h3>What is a hasty generalization fallacy?</h3>
- Coming to a conclusion about a population based on observations from a very small sample size.
- It is usually false and overblown.
Kevin came to his decision based on the small sample size of his grandparents alone. They are simply too small to account for the millions of older people out there.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on hasty generalization at brainly.com/question/1580820.
