1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notka56 [123]
3 years ago
14

QUESTION 1

English
1 answer:
nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
5 0

The question is related to an article on why people pay ridiculous money for strange celebrity memorabilia.

In the article, we find that investment firms specialize in monetizing celebrity relics or collectibles. Some of them specialize in certain celebrities depending on the strength of the brand of such a celebrity.

So the interesting point and the center of the article revolves around why people would buy not just any collectible, but items that have absolutely no value which may in certain instances be laughable had the items belonged to someone else.

For example, it is said that a broken toilet belonging to John Lennon was sold for $16,027, Two slices of French toast, half-eaten by Justin Timberlake was sold for $1,025, and John F. Kennedy's used pair of boxer shorts was auctioned away for $5, 000.

It is obvious that these items hold very little if any value at all. If the celebrities themselves were to raise funds for charity, they most likely would have used other artifacts.

Hence, the most logical conclusion is that these items are purchased not because they are valuable, certainly, that would make sense, but for some sentimental connection to the celebrity who used them.

Click here to read more about the sale of memorabilia:

brainly.com/question/2403966

You might be interested in
Money and Tears<br> What is this message portraying?
Maru [420]
Money isn’t going to bring happiness; money doesn’t solve everything; rich people have feelings; you can’t buy happiness etc...
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I dont know :(
Nady [450]
A: It can reflect on the long-term impact of
the event.

because it would be able to include things that happened in the 50 years after the event had occurred.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role does the infinitive phrase play in the sentence below?
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer: C. Noun

Explanation: Because it's the subject of the sentence.

4 0
4 years ago
What is meant by “invisible strength” in this story?
photoshop1234 [79]

Invisible strength could mean a hidden talent. Or strength (strength to do something challenging, out of their comfort zone) the character didn't know they had.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the author’s secondary purpose for writing "Letter to His Son"?
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The adventure of the engineers thumb
    5·1 answer
  • Which best describes what is needed to make hardware function?
    12·2 answers
  • In which 2 ways can a setting affect a story?
    14·1 answer
  • Every time the main character has something important happen in her life -- a summer with her grandparents, her family's move, a
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone help fast Help fast please
    15·1 answer
  • What is the difference between internal and external conflict?
    15·1 answer
  • Fvgbhnjumiyhgrfvbghnjm
    8·1 answer
  • Why does Jeffrey Bartholet claim that deterioration of the Taj Mahal adds to its beauty
    8·1 answer
  • All of the following describe the old man's character EXCEPT—
    5·1 answer
  • Write a speech on Endurance
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!