There are three rules of finding the horizontal asymptote depending on the orders of the numerator and denominator. If the degrees are equal for the numerator and the denominator, then the horizontal asymptote is equal to y = the ratio of the coefficients of the highest order from the numerator and the denominator. If the degree in the numerator is less than the degree in the denominator, then there the x axis is the horizontal asymptote. If on the other hand, the order in the numerator is greater than that of the denominator, then there is no horizontal asymptote.
Answer:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}5&7\\5&-8\\3&-9\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{ccc}c\\d\end{array}\right] =\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-16\\3\\-15\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D5%267%5C%5C5%26-8%5C%5C3%26-9%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Dc%5C%5Cd%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%3D%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-16%5C%5C3%5C%5C-15%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
This tells us that:
![A=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}5&7\\5&-8\\3&-9\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D5%267%5C%5C5%26-8%5C%5C3%26-9%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
![b=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-16\\3\\-15\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=b%3D%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-16%5C%5C3%5C%5C-15%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
So we are saying we have scalars, c and d, such that:
![c\left[\begin{array}{ccc}5\\5\\ 3\end{array}\right]+d\left[\begin{array}{ccc}7\\-8\\-9\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-16\\3\\-15\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=c%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D5%5C%5C5%5C%5C%203%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%2Bd%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D7%5C%5C-8%5C%5C-9%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%3D%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D-16%5C%5C3%5C%5C-15%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
.
So we want to find a way to express this as:
Ax=b where x is the scalar vector, ![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}c\\d\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Dc%5C%5Cd%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
.
So we can write this as:
Responder:
La pizza con un perímetro de 100 cm es más grande ¿verdad?
Explicación paso a paso:
Deja que la pizza tenga forma circular.
Sea el área de la pizza = πd² / 4 y;
Perímetro de la pizza = πd
d es el diámetro de la pizza
Si la madre dice que el que tiene un perímetro de 100 cm es más grande, para estar seguros necesitamos obtener el diámetro de la pizza. La de mayor diámetro será la pizza más grande.
P = 100cm
100 = πd
d = 100 / π
d = 100 / 3,14
d = 31,85 cm
El diámetro de la pizza mamá es de 31,85 cm.
Si el padre dice que el que tiene un área de 100 cm² es más grande, obtengamos también el diámetro para estar seguros.
A = πd² / 4
100 = πd² / 4
400 = πd²
d² = 400 / π
d² = 400 / 3,14
d² = 127,39
d = √127,39
d = 11,29 cm
Por lo tanto, el diámetro de la pizza padre es de 11,29 cm.
Dado que el diámetro de la pizza madre es mayor que el de esa, la pizza con un perímetro de 100 cm es más grande, lo que demuestra que la madre tiene razón.
I believe its 27.75. I wouldn't take my word for it though.
The solution depends on the value of
. To make things simple, assume
. The homogeneous part of the equation is
and has characteristic equation
which admits the characteristic solution
.
For the solution to the nonhomogeneous equation, a reasonable guess for the particular solution might be
. Then
So you have
This means
and so the general solution would be
