An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
There are three words in a million little pieces.
<em>To the CEO of Game stop's video's: Unfortunately, I made a purchase at a Game stop in buckeye az and your video game was scratched and it was the wrong game in the case. Unfortunately a game stop employee would not let me return the game, due to it not being the right game in the proper case, which was not my fault because it was the store's employee that was at fault for putting the wrong game in the case. I am extremely disappointed in the lack of customer service. I should have been able to return the game due to it being the store's fault that the video was the wrong game in the case, in the end I paid for a game that I did not ask for.</em>
b...a sunday afternoon in front of the TV ..is the actual answer
A character's actions in a story can often indirectly provide the opinion of the author on a current social issue. An example would be a character talking to a friend, or thinking about it. Hope this helps!
