1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
3 years ago
13

Why is it important that Indus Valley Cities have shown evidence of being well planned

History
2 answers:
Anni [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The land in Indus Valley Civilization was the primary physical resource, which was intentionally laid out into well-organized cities so that people can live together and interact with each other as well as with natural resources like river, forests, stones and man-made resources like houses, streets, wells and Explanation:

hope this helps!

Alexandra [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The land in Indus Valley Civilization was the primary physical resource, which was intentionally laid out into well-organized cities so that people can live together and interact with each other as well as with natural resources like river, forests, stones and man-made resources like houses, streets, wells and granaries.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Article I. There shall be a perfect, permanent, and universal peace, and a sincere and cordial amity between the United States o
muminat

Answer: Japan and the United States will be allies

Explanation:

The Treaty had the purpouse of opening up Japan to American commerce, ending the japanesse policy of isolation which it had managed to mantain for 220 years. It further encouraged peace and cooperation between the two nations in the future and though it achieved the short term objective of opening up Japan to foreign trade, the japaneese saw it as a weakness since they were forced to sign it to avoid military conflict. The subsequent treaties with the west had the effect of debilitating the already weak position of the Shogun, empowering the Emperor and leading to the rearmament and modernization of Japan.

5 0
3 years ago
American strategy for winning the war in the pacific
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

leapfrogging

Explanation:

also known as island hopping was a military strategy employed by the Allies in the Pacific War against the Empire of Japan during World War II

4 0
3 years ago
What part of Brazil culture reflect African influences?
nordsb [41]
I believe the answer is slavery
3 0
3 years ago
When was the bill of rights written?
Alex73 [517]
Date<span> Proposed: September, 25th 1789. </span>Date<span> Ratified: December 15th, 1791. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the Committee of Public Safety pass the Decree Against Profiteers?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the name of the group the was assigned to investigate the jfk assassination?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the second continental congress send the Olive Branch Petition to King George III?
    15·2 answers
  • In what ways did Mikhail Gorbachev change the Soviet Union? Select all that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • How would you define the progressive era?
    15·2 answers
  • N 1776, the statement that all men are created equal referred to__________.
    7·2 answers
  • MULTI CHOICE
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!! 15 POINTS!! WILL GIVE BRAINLY!!
    10·2 answers
  • Please help what’s the answer because this is due in a couple minutesss!!
    13·2 answers
  • Can someone help Im not sure which one is incorrect and what the other answer is
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!