Answer:
social welfare spending (education, hospitals, housing, schools, etc.).
Explanation:
This quote deals with the problem of the ever increasing cost of national defense versus the welfare of the citizens. The US spends more money on national defense than any other country in the world, around 37% of the total military budget of the world. It also represents 15% of the total federal budget and almost half of all discretionary spending.
That is a lot of money to be distributed among a small number of private firms. Usually Republicans tend to favor a large army, but Democrats never lower their budget either. The largest military contractors are Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Raytheon. They are all located in blue states, actually Maryland currently has a Republican governor but both their senators are democrats as well as most of the representatives. Boeing has its headquarters in Washington State and Raytheon in Massachusetts. These aren't blue states, they are indigo states.
But as the military budget increases and the power of military contractors also increases, who will dare to stop them. Military spending is much higher than welfare spending, even if you throw in Medicaid into the equation ($1.6 trillion vs $1 trillion).
The question really is, are guns more important than the well being of our citizens? I guess it depends who you ask.
Answer:
Choose CareCo.
Explanation:
Given : CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees. ApathyInc pays slightly higher wages than CareCo, but does not offer health insurance.
A person who is unhealthy & expects to have high healthcare expenses : would have issues having direct health insurance from an insurer, based on high risk evaluation. Even if by chance, he/ she gets, it will be at extremely high price i.e premium rates & is likely to have less coverage. So, the person rationally would prefer to protect himself / herself from this huge health expenditure risk, & would protect self & family from catastrophic health costs. He / she would do so by choosing to work for Care Co, which gives generous health insurance to all its employees, by sacrifising higher salary by Apathy giving no health insurance. He/ she is logical as the wage differential is likely to be less than catastrophic health costs
Answer
1. Answer for part one and two are added in attachment.
Explanation:
1. For part one , process summary cost is attached in files.
2. Answer for section two is :
Date Title of accounts Total Debit ($) Total Credit ($)
31-Oct Work In Process Inventory - Assembly 1,143,100.00
Work In Process Inventory - Cutting 1,143,100.00
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
xlsx
</span>
<span class="sg-text sg-text--link sg-text--bold sg-text--link-disabled sg-text--blue-dark">
docx
</span>
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option A) contributory negligence .
Explanation:
The given above case where the CPA has responsibility of 20% in the fraud and company has 80% of the responsibility , then with the help of contributory negligence approach to liability , CPA would be able to avoid the liability completely .
Contributory negligence can be termed as the failure on the part of accuser ( plaintiffs ) to exercise a reasonable care of their safety. Here as per the universal law, the amount of compensation that plaintiff might receive would decrease if their actions have led to the increase in the likelihood of the incident .
