No, this is not true. WebMD is a great example asking you of simple symptoms that you may be facing and your results could present an apparent fatal disease. This constantly scares the population of netizens whenever they would want a quick diagnosis online through these medical information sites. The best solution to your symptoms is to visit your family doctor or a licensed physician who will give you proper diagnosis checking your vital signs and other related information. Do not always trust the internet and the information it gives you as a user you must take the information with discretion before reacting inappropriately.
it means to alt f4 then that would help so it can eat the microscope then have it digested
Was this in reference to literal audio archives? If so, I don't see any cons beside possible copyright infringement.
If you're talking about the codecs themselves, then I can do that.
<span>Pros:
</span>- Widespread acceptance. Supported in nearly all hardware devices, and continually adopted by newer ones.
- Faster decoding. Much more so than FLAC, Vorbis, etc.
- Relaxed licensing schedule.
<span>Cons:
</span><span>
</span>- Lower quality and efficiency than most modern codecs. (To be fair, never really noticed this one).
- Sometimes the maximum bitrate isn't enough.
- Pretty much void/unusable for high definition audio (higher than <span>48kHz).</span>
I receive interpersonal support on almost every sight I go on: even on this one right now! An example of interpersonal support can be a typing editor, I believe.
