Answer/Explanation:
The author wishes to use irony to communicate disapproval in bad weather. Which choice best meets this goal? According to the weather station, you should expect rain, granular and a variety of small pets to come down from the sky later this afternoon. Well, it's not just a lovely prediction.
Irony is a picture of language used when it tries to create a non literal truth of the facts.
Thus, the author uses a very ironic form or last fact found in the statement.
Answer:
the jurors discuss the case
Explanation:
The correct answer is this - <span>this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting.
If the conditions were a little bit different, then his IRB review would also require different results. However, since there is no real interaction with the children, but rather only observation, an IRB review is not necessary in this case and can be avoided.
</span>
That a lot of people believe that balancing the federal government's budget equally with spending cuts and higher taxes is a good option.
Hope this helps you. :)
Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
