Hi there!
What is the question and then i can help!
Hi there!
»»————- ★ ————-««
I believe your answer is:
Option A;
»»————- ★ ————-««
Here’s why:
- We can use inverse operations to solve for 'm'.
⸻⸻⸻⸻
⸻⸻⸻⸻
Any number that is less than or equal to the value of three-fifths would work.
The option that is less than or equal to (3/5) is option A.
Assuming that there are more options than the options shown, choose the numbers that are less than or equal to (3/5).
»»————- ★ ————-««
Hope this helps you. I apologize if it’s incorrect.
1700 because I multiply 30 x 20 then 20 x 5 then 30 x 5 then add them all up and multiply your answer by 2
Answer:
-70
Step-by-step explanation:
subtract 47 from both sides to get
x = -23 - 47
Complete question is;
Regarding the violation of multicollinearity, which of the following description is wrong?
a. It changes the intercept of the regression line.
b. It changes the sign of the slope.
c. It changes the slope of the regression line.
d. It changes the value of F-tests.
e. It changes the value of T-tests
Answer:
a. It changes the intercept of the regression line
Step-by-step explanation:
Multicollinearity is a term used in multiple regression analysis to show a high correlation between independent variables of a study.
Since it deals with independent variables correlation, it means it must be found before getting the regression equation.
Now, looking at the options, the one that doesn't relate with multicollinearity is option A because the intercept of the regression line is the value of y that is predicted when x is 0. Meanwhile, multicollinearity from definition above does in no way change the intercept of the regression line because it doesn't predict the y-value when x is zero.