Answer:
Although it is controversial topic, it is not a recommended practice among socienty to cultivate BT corn when alternative methods of increasing plant yield are already available. On the other hand, scientists are encouraging more research on genetically modified (GM) solutions with lesser/reduced impact on ecosystem.
Explanation:
Although, cultivating BT corn helps improving the yield, reduce insecticides usage, and enhance the grain quality, it has been extensively debated to reduce this practice globally. This is because of severals reasons. At first, cultivation of BT corn affects non-target organisms that interact with the plant for symbiotic or neutral reasons including pollination. Due to genetic modificaitons, BT corn produce BT-proteins that kills the non-target organism. Secondly, it increases the insect resistance and those insects which survives even after chewing plant tissues of BT-corn, they are found to have resistance against several toxins at high doses. Once these chemicals enters the food chain, they could be extremely toxic to other naturally growing organisms.
Prince Charles stated that use of GM plants is disaster and should be banned immediately. Likewise, he said that it is also impacting the climate change. On the other hand, Prof. Smith showed a contradictory opinion and said that the views of Prince Charles are saddening. He is seeing the one sided picture only. He should ask for extensive research rather discouraging this aspect of modern science.
In my opinion, I would also say that the technology should be improved and make more eco-friendly rather than complete abolishing especially when the apparent benefits are greater than the harmful effects.
I think it was the creation of natural rights and the Declaration of Independence. These ideas were ignited during the Age of Enlightenment, wherein people learn to reason and rationalize the things and situation around them. They were able to hone the idea of democracy as well as improved the idea of government, which pave way to creation of constitutions and city-states
Answer:
C. Reactant and product concentrations in the test tube are different from those in the cell.
Explanation:
Cells convert some of the energy from ATP hydrolysis in to different forms of energy other than heat. ATP energy does not always generate more heat. Many times, energy is used for different purposes.
If a solid object is cut in half, the mass and volume are both divided by two, but the density remains the same.
<h3>What is an intensive property?</h3>
Intensive property is a property that does not depend on the quantity of a substance while an extensive property depends on the quantity.
Mass and volume is an example of extensive physical property while density is an example of intensive property.
This suggests that if a solid object is cut in half, the mass and volume are both divided by two, but the density remains the same.
Learn more about intensive property at: brainly.com/question/13733851
#SPJ1
The answer is a bc it’s the eight answer
