The split left the Democratic Party with enough support to win the election.
Answer:by letting people speak what they want to say
Explanation:oskddj
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
Well, there isn't a lot of information here to work with. If I were Ben, I would go to the manager of the place, if not, then the owner, aka CEO.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Nullification proposed that the states had the right to decide which national laws states would accept.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- With a view to dispense greater power to the states and to maintain their autonomy, John Calhoun proposed that the state governments should be allowed to choose which federal laws did they not want to implement in their states.
- The demands put up by the theory were never processed by any federal courts of the US as it is deemed that such a law would prove to be threat to the integrity of the nation.
