Answer:
a. positive
b. normative
c. positive
d. normative
Explanation:
Note that a normative statement as used in economics refers to a view of what should be done, or how things or policies should be or not be. While the Positive statement gives a point blank description of what the state of things are.
a. It is a fact of course that in the past decades U.S. companies have outsourced millions of job overseas, thus this is a positive (descriptive) statement.
b. By saying companies that outsource jobs are acting immorally indicates a normative or judgemental view of what is morally right.
c. This statement is a fact, because such actions is in line with economic theory; in effect would stop outsourcing jobs.
d. This is rather a view of what should be done. Which clearly indicates the statement as normative.
Answer:
Explanation:
The sugar would dissolve in water. You could then pour off the solution and wash the remaining sand with a bit more water. Heat the water to evaporate it from the sugar, and the two are separated
Answer: C - $30,000
Explanation: Johnston Company wants to double production of Product X from 1,000 units to 2,000 units.
The variable manufacturing cost per unit is $10. The variable non manufacturing cost per unit is $20.
The selling price per unit is $50
To increase production by 1000 units
Total cost is $10 + $20 = $30
Total incremental cost = 1,000 * $30= $30,000
Answer:
C. workers with more years of formal schooling are less likely to be affected by ability, effort, and chance.
Explanation:
The <em>signalling theory in education</em> tells us that employees send "signals" to their employees regarding their education. In other words, employers are willing to pay higher wages to employees with additional years of formal schooling.
This means these qualified workers have their wage primarily defined by their education level, which does not always reflect their true skill-set (the output of ability and effort).
Answer:
accounts receivable = $276,000
total credit sales = $1,000,000
3% of accounts receivable will not be decollete = $276,000 x 3% = $8,280
if allowance for doubtful accounts has a credit balance of $2,200, you must add = $8,280 - $2,200 = $6,080
the adjusting entry should be:
Dr Bad debt expense 6,080
Cr Allowance for doubtful accounts 6,080
Since allowance for doubtful accounts is a contra asset account it has a credit balance that reduces the value of accounts receivable.
