Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
coefficient = 0
Explanation:
We have the formula to calculate the price elasticity of demand as following:
<em>Elasticity coefficient = % Change in quantity/ % Change in price</em>
As given:
+) The percentage change in price is: (120-150)/150= - 20%
+) The quantity bought remains unchanged - which means the percentage change in quantity demanded is 0%
=> <em>Elasticity coefficient = % Change in quantity/ % Change in price</em>
<em>= 0/-20 = 0</em>
<em />
<em>So the coefficient of price elasticity of demand in this example would be 0</em>
Answer:
The activities of the Federal Reserve Board have the most direct influence on: bank interest rates, monetary policy (interest rates, credit, etc.)
Answer: rotate the bottom to the right, top to bottom and right to top
Explanation:
