Null hypothesis: There is no significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Alternative hypothesis :There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Finally the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
In the existing process the sample size and population was not known.,but the percentage of rejected screens were given as 12%.,but in the new process out of 100 screens only 6 are rejected
percentage of rejected screens using new process = 6÷ 100 ×100 = 6%
percentage of rejected screens using existing (old) process = 12%
so the new process is the effective one which reduces the rejection rate of screens., hence it is concluded that There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
so the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
If you fill in x=0, you are left with the y intercept. In the picture you can see it must be larger than y=10. This invalidates answer A and D.
The x-coordinate top of the parabola ax²+bx+c=0 is given by y = -b/2a, so immediately we can see -b has to be positive. This leads you to answer C because -9x implies b=-9, and --9 is positive.
Answer:
3 hours
Step-by-step explanation: