Answer:
B) $ 70,000.
Explanation:
Debt service expense
Debt service expense is the interest expense incurred to avail the debt services from another entity.
Debt service expense can be calculated using the following formula
Debt service expense = Face value of Bonds x Interest rate x Semiannual fraction
Where
Face value of bonds = $3,500,000
Interest rate = 4%
Semiannual fraction = 6 / 12 = 1/ 2
placing values in the formula
Debt service expense = $3,500,000 x 4% x 1/2
Debt service expense = $70,000
Answer: $88,700
Explanation:
Given that,
House value = $275,000
Mortgage = $195,000
Car value = $12,000
Car loans = $7,500
Investments = $3,000
Bank account = $2,700
Owes on a credit card = $1,500
Keisha’s net worth:
= House value - Mortgage + Car value - Car loans + Investments + Bank account - Owes on a credit card
= $275,000 - $195,000 + $12,000 - $7,500 + $3,000 + $2,700 - $1,500
= $88,700
Answer:
Seasonal.
Explanation:
A trade discount can be defined as a reduction in the price of goods given by a manufacturer to a wholesaler or retailer when they buy units of goods in larger quantities. This ultimately implies that, a trade discount is a percentage reduction in price given by a manufacturer to a wholesaler or retailer in order to encourage them to buy the goods in larger quantities and thus, increase revenue and profits.
Also, a seasonal discount can be defined as a reduction in the price of goods given during off-peak periods (off-season) in order to encourage customers to purchase a particular product.
Hence, when a firm or store offers a price reduction to customers who buy during off-peak periods throughout the year, we say the firm is giving a seasonal discount.
Answer:
D) Buyer
Explanation:
The buyer is responsible for developing the technical specifications of the product that is going to be purchased, inviting potential vendors, and will also be the person in charge of actually executing the purchase. The buyer is the person that has the actual authority and is responsible for carrying out the purchase.
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
We have to use MM proposition that cost of equity will change itself in such a manner so that it can take care of its debt.
Cost of equity:
= WACC of all equity firm + (WACC of all equity - Cost of debt ) × (Debt -to-equity ratio)
At the beginning, when there was no debt,
WACC = cost of equity = 12 %
Levered cost of equity:
= 12% + ( 12% - 6%) × 0.5
= 15%
Therefore, Rearden's levered cost of equity would be closest to 15%.
