Answer:
Legal responsibility
Explanation:
Since there have been regulations put in place by the government, it is thereforre a legally binding agreement between XYZ company and any other companies that does same as XYZ company.
The failure of XYZ company to honour the set regulations is a breach in its legal responsibilty alongside its corporate social responsibilty as well and it can be taken up by the government by either charging the XYZ company to court or revoking their operating license.
Cheers.
The accounting principles, assumptions, and constraints describes are identified as follows: A) 7, B) 6, C) 8, D) 9, E) 1, F) 4, G) 3.
<h3>What are Accounting Principles?</h3>
These are rules or laws that govern the reporting and recording of the financial information of a business.
7 - Expense Recognition Principle: This holds the rule of thought that expenses made ought to be recorded in the books or recognized in the same time frame as the revenue transactions they are related to.
3 - Monetary Unit Principle: This law indicates that if a transaction cannot be expressed in a currency, then it shouldn't be recorded. This means "in-kind" transactions and favors hold no place in proper Financial Bookkeeping practice.
See the link below for more about Accounting Principles:
brainly.com/question/23008273
Answer:
implied
Explanation:
Warranty is an assurance that a product will do the work for which it was intended and be of the same quality and grade like others of its class received by a buyer of a product from the seller whether expressly stated or not . This follows that where the product is discovered to be substandard or defective, the seller will either repair or replace the product in line with the terms and conditions of sales.
Implied Warranty is a quality assurance statement given by a buyer to a seller that is neither oral nor written but generally understood by law to be associated with products and services of that industry
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
$19.20
Explanation:
Computation for the unit product cost that would appear on the job cost sheet for this job.
First step is to compute the Total Product cost
Job 243
Direct material $ 51,870
Direct labor (435*11) 4,785
Overhead (516*13) 6,708
Total Product cost $63,363
Now let Compute the unit product cost
Unit product cost=$63,363/3,300 units
Unit product cost =$19.20
Therefore the unit product cost that would appear on the job cost sheet for this job is $19.20
