The Catholic Church has long taken the question of slavery seriously. Slavery has been practiced and approved of by numerous cultures and faiths worldwide throughout the majority of human history.
<h3>Who and why did slavery begin?</h3>
In order to help with the cultivation of products like tobacco, African slaves were first brought to Jamestown, Virginia, in North America in 1619. They left towards the north in late 1848 because it is where slaves are freed and where slavery doesn't exist.
<h3>The US Constitution: Does it permit slavery?</h3>
Yes, according to the 13th Amendment, slavery is still a legal punishment for crimes for which a person has been found guilty in a court of law.
To learn more about Slavery here:
brainly.com/question/1910034
#SPJ4
It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer: both of them will have the fault.
Explanation:well, if I were to be the Judge of this case, I will hold both to be at fault. On Sutton's part, she leased the house out and she should have kept it in a good shape. Though the house was not in good shape, Laws had lodge series of complaints concerning the disrepair, which means that Sutton should have had it repaired.
Sutton promised Laws that he was going to repair the stairs, so, I would say, Laws would have assumed that Sutton would have repaired the stairs before he(laws) returned back from his business trip.
However, we should not forget that whenever we assess a situation according to the law there must have been a legal contract but in this case, Laws never entered into a contract with Sutton to make the repairs. Which means that Laws cannot fully blame Sutton. Therefore, i will hold both responsible.
Glossy eyes, Slurred Speech, and bad balance,
