When the interpretation of data is being judged by its objectivity, this is known as reliability.
<h3>What is objectivity in research?</h3>
It means that the data used and its interpretation were done in a way that is free of bias.
This ensures that the data is reliable because it tested what it purported to test without any bias altering the results and making it unreliable.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more on bias at brainly.com/question/4095022.
Answer:
Borrow the money, knowing that the payments would be made
increasingly cheaper dollars.
Explanation:
I answered on USATestprep and got it right :) !!!!!!
Answer: Beginning in the 1970s and 80s, acid precipitation has impacted the Adirondacks ... Acidification is caused by emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide from the ... Like many amphibians, red-backed salamanders do not have lungs; instead, they ... According to studies, increasing soil acidity due to acid rain
Explanation:
They do not have lungs.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Option A is better statement, a positive one, it is not good dogs should have too much weight ,it is required of dogs to run and make good runs ,dogs are meant to be of good weight in case they chase an intruder. An over weight dog would not be able to run and that can cause problems. So therefore option A is a positive statement. As it explains a positive scenario of the size of the dog and what would be better for it.