1. Let the four consecutive numbers be x, x+1, x+2, x+3
The sum of four consecutive number is already given to us = 70
Therefore
⇒(x)+(x+1)+(x+2)+(x+3)=70
We need to combine x as we have four x terms in the equation. The next step is to get all of the x’s on one side of the equation and all the numbers on the other side. The same rule applies – whatever you do to one side of the equation, you must do to the other side as well!
⇒4x+6=70⇒4x=64⇒x=16
So, the four numbers are 16, 17, 18 and 19.
Hence, the greatest number among them is 19.
Responder:
240 huevos
Explicación paso a paso:
Número de cajas de huevos = 4
Huevos por caja = 50
Total de huevos en caja = 50 * 4 = 200 huevos
Número de cajas = 3
Número de huevos por caja = 10
Total de huevos en caja = 10 * 4 = 40 huevos
Huevos totales = (huevos en caja + huevos en cartón)
Total = (200 + 40) = 240 huevos
The square root of 48 simplified is 4 sqrt 3.
The answer is 3x squared -11x-10
Answer: Choice C

============================================================
Explanation:
The graph is shown below. The base of the 3D solid is the blue region. It spans from x = 0 to x = 1. It's also above the x axis, and below the curve 
Think of the blue region as the floor of this weirdly shaped 3D room.
We're told that the cross sections are perpendicular to the x axis and each cross section is a square. The side length of each square is
where 0 < x < 1
Let's compute the area of each general cross section.

We'll be integrating infinitely many of these infinitely thin square slabs to find the volume of the 3D shape. Think of it like stacking concrete blocks together, except the blocks are side by side (instead of on top of each other). Or you can think of it like a row of square books of varying sizes. The books are very very thin.
This is what we want to compute

Apply a u-substitution
u = -2x
du/dx = -2
du = -2dx
dx = du/(-2)
dx = -0.5du
Also, don't forget to change the limits of integration
- If x = 0, then u = -2x = -2(0) = 0
- If x = 1, then u = -2x = -2(1) = -2
This means,

I used the rule that
which says swapping the limits of integration will have us swap the sign out front.
--------
Furthermore,
![\displaystyle 0.5\int_{-2}^{0}e^{u}du = \frac{1}{2}\left[e^u+C\right]_{-2}^{0}\\\\\\= \frac{1}{2}\left[(e^0+C)-(e^{-2}+C)\right]\\\\\\= \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - \frac{1}{e^2}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%200.5%5Cint_%7B-2%7D%5E%7B0%7De%5E%7Bu%7Ddu%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cleft%5Be%5Eu%2BC%5Cright%5D_%7B-2%7D%5E%7B0%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cleft%5B%28e%5E0%2BC%29-%28e%5E%7B-2%7D%2BC%29%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cleft%5B1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Be%5E2%7D%5Cright%5D)
In short,
![\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}e^{-2x}dx = \frac{1}{2}\left[1 - \frac{1}{e^2}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B1%7De%5E%7B-2x%7Ddx%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cleft%5B1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Be%5E2%7D%5Cright%5D)
This points us to choice C as the final answer.