The judge is the one who listens and analyzes the evidence presented by the prosecutor, and it is who takes the decision based on his own criteria and the evidence presented. However, if the judge thinks that the evidence is inconclusive, then the accused appears before the Grand Jury, which is made up of 23 crime-free and randomly selected citizens. So, the Judge is normally who decides whether the case should go to trial, or not, and who hears first all the evidence presented by the prosecutor.
The appropriate response is Ethnocentrism, drive out European colonialism. Unmistakably the essential main impetus for the Imperialism in Europe was ethnocentrism and not the prudent advantages the Europeans were making. Ethnocentrism is judging another culture exclusively by the qualities and measures of one's own way of life. Ethnocentric people judge different gatherings in respect to their own ethnic gathering or culture, particularly with worry for dialect, conduct, traditions, and religion.
He was important because when he was little he was an ordinary kid her wasn’t like the other so whatever he does he know that maybe it’s wrong or not
From what i understand, the church liked the consistency of it, since it had been used in the liturgies and all for such a long time. hope that helps?
Answer:
It was an urban movement at a time when most slaves worked on rural properties. Yet the abolitionst movement was also more concerned with freeing the white population from what had come to be viewed as the burden of slavery
Explanation:
