The correct answer is Commander in Chief
Is the commander of a nation's military forces, or a significant member of these forces. In the latter case, this element can be defined as the forces in a given region, or the forces that are associated by a given function in common. In practice, it refers to military competences that are deposited with the Executive of a nation-state, such as its head of state or government. Often the commander-in-chief of a country is not a patented officer or even a war veteran, and it is by this legal statute that civilian control of the armed forces is implemented in those states where it is constitutionally required.
Why by Mimiwhatsup: People held enslaved people as workers and relied on them to operate. Especially for picking cotton they even bred slaves and sold them as high prices.
I think it’s D the one that said they needa defeat the communist troops
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The Texas revolution only lasted one year so c is out.
Texas fought against the government of mexico not Spain so its not b.
Last but not least both the British and Mexican armies were much larger than the Texan and american armies respectively.
Hope this helped! Stay Safe! :)
The Initial Five Year Plans were created to focus on industrialization of the Soviet Union<span> and thus placed a major focus on </span><span>heavy industry</span>
