Answer: its A or C
most likely C
Explanation:
Continued conversion of Brazil’s tropical forests to farmland and urban sprawl won’t just make things difficult for the Brazilians who depend on the forest; it will also limit the Amazon’s ability to function as the “lungs of the Earth” that help regulate the Earth’s climate. But it’s not all bad news.
The answer is elites I believe
Answer:
1. Because of diffrent political belifes. (We must remeber that the soviet union saw capitalism as a disgusting foe, and the United States saw Communism as a form of tyranny.)
2. To elminate a national security threat near the homland. (This is because this was the cloest communist nation next to the united states, with ties with the Soviet Union and had the power to launch nukes at the homeland. The main way to fix this would be cutting the head off the snake {aka killing castro})
Answer:
an 'imminent' lawless action
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the government can only restrict speech when it incites an 'imminent' lawless action. This means that freedom of speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker is trying to incite a violation of any law and the action is imminent and likely.
