Answer:
1:6
2:2
3:4, it's twice the MAD.
Step-by-step explanation:
6-2=4
MAD: 2
There are many reasons one may want to simplify, rearranging to find specific values - or maybe just making it simpler
Well, let's do some examples:
y(x(3+2)) +2 = -2y +2 <span>< I just made this one up, it looks really complicated right now, none the less it can be simplified easily
</span>y(3x+2x) + 2 = - 2y +2
3xy + 2xy + 2 = -2y +2
5xy + 2 = -2y +2 <-- the +2's dissapear because they cancel out
5xy = -2y
<span>And there we have it, that long expression has been simplified to something really simple.
</span>
Another example:
3(4(x+3(2 +z)) - 5)= 3y <span><- you can start where ever, I like starting in the middle
</span>3 * (4 * (x + 3*(2 + z)) - 5 ) = 3y <span><- here it is spaced out, we get a much better view
</span><span>3 * (4 * (x + 6 + 3z) - 5 ) = 3y</span>
3 * (4x + 24 + 12z - 5) = 3y <- divide both sides by 3 ..
4x + 24 + 12z - 5 = y <- much better
<span>
</span>Note: Simplify means solving to a degree, but you can't solve it because it has unknowns
Answer 1) both have spent $30 on the 5th day
Answer:
There is enough evidence to reject the manufacturer’s claim and the standardized test statistic z is -3.43
Step-by-step explanation:
A manufacturer of sprinkler systems designed for fire protection claims that the average activating temperature is at least 135°F.
So, Null hypothesis:
Alternate hypothesis :
To test this claim, you randomly select a sample of 32 systems and find the mean activation temperature to be 133°F.
x=133
n = 32
Population Standard deviation =
Formula :
z=-3.43
Refer the z table for p value
p value = 0.0003
p value < α
So, we failed to accept null hypothesis
Hence there is enough evidence to reject the manufacturer’s claim and the standardized test statistic z is -3.43
The car could travel 9,000 ft in 3 hrs .
it would take the car 600 hrs to travel 36,000 ft .