Answer:
.001
Step-by-step explanation:
1 / 1000, so you move the decimal point over three places.
Answer:
200.131234
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>If a number is not a rational number, then it is not a whole number. The converse is true.
---> the sentence above is the only one that has true condition, true hypothesis and true conclusion.
You see:
></span><span>If a number is not a whole number, then it is not a rational number. The converse is false. ( converse must be true)
></span><span>If a number is a rational number, then it is a whole number. The converse is false. (converse must be true)
></span><span>If a number is not a rational number, then it is a whole number. The converse is false. (hypothesis should've been "then it is not a whole number")
</span><span>
In the Law of Detachment, if both conditional and hypothesis are true, then the conclusion is true.
</span><span>All whole numbers are rational numbers.
In the "If-the"n form: If a number is whole, then it is rational.
Given: 5 is a whole number.
Conclusion: 5 is rational.</span>
