The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include options to answer the question.
However, we can answer it based on our knowledge of the subject.
The arrival in Texas of the industries of munitions, shipbuilding, and petroleum was the direct result of the war.
Yes, industrialization and the fabrication of ships, supplies for the war, and the development of the oil industry was a direct result of the United States entering World War I.
With the United States entering the war, the troops at the war front needed all kinds of war supplies. Oil played a key role as an important raw material in the industries, as well as steel for shipbuilding. Industries had to work hard to comply with the war demanding and the US army necessities in Europe.
Bill is sent to the senate, Two third of the sanid boards to overwrite the veto, Two third of the households to overwrite the veto., The bill goes back to the house of representatives and The will passed and become law.
<h3>How is a
bill passed step by step?</h3>
First is bill is presented by the representative of the house, then the bill is assigned to the member of the committee to study, if the member is satisfied with the bill then the bill is set on the calendar to discussed or debate or amendment, if the bill is pass by the committee then the bill is sent it to Senate.
Thus, statements are arranged in order.
For more details about bill passed step by step, click here:
brainly.com/question/1457812
#SPJ1
Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
