Explanation:
<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<em><u>(16,800-$34,300 on average)-based on if its public or private.</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em><u>Thank you for asking this great question need any other help please let me know by commenting below I'd be glad to help.</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em><u> I'd also greatly appreciate you if you mark me as brainliest and click that thanks button.( optional )</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
<em><u>Your brainly friend ( lauralit1 )</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
Answer:
1. It made a Unilateral mistake
2. It cannot be voided by the cruise line
Explanation:
This cruise line has made a Unilateral mistake in this scenario.
In terms of the law, this cruise line does not have the power to void the transaction on its own accord in the normal course of business. but it has the right to plea in a law court that it did this business transaction sale based on non availability of complete price quote and also that there was a unilateral mistake of facts. It will also have to make a case that the sale was caused by the buyer who tried to benefit from the mistake through misrepresentation and omissions.
The court would then decide on the case at it own discretion.
Answer:
One of the most common reasons that eminent domain cases are brought to court is over disputes about just compensation. The takings clause in the United States Constitution that established the government's power of eminent domain states
Answer:
Gideon v. Wainwright, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 18, 1963, ruled (9–0) that states are required to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants charged with a felony
Explanation: