Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed
The answer is c. 10-20 seconds
<u>Answer:</u>
- BEP = EBIT / Total Assets
BEP = $2,451 / $43,000 = 0.057
-
Profit Margin = Net Profit / Sales
Profit Margin = $990 / $51,600 = 0.0192
-
Operating Margin = Operating Profit / Sales
Operating Margin = $2,451 / $51,600 = 0.0475
-
Dividends per share = Dividend paid to Shareholders / Number of shares outstanding
Dividends per share = $346.67 / $500 = 0.69334
-
EPS = Net Income available to Shareholders / Number of shares outstanding
EPS = $990 / $500 = $1.98
- P/E ratio = Market price per share / EPS
P/E ratio = $23.7 / 1.98 = 11.97
-
Book value per share = Shareholders Equity / Shares outstanding
Book value per share = $15,265 / $500 = $30.53
-
Market-to-book ratio = Market Value per share / Book value per share
Market-to-book ratio = $23.7 / S30.53 = 0.7763
-
Equity Multiplier = Total Assets / Shareholders Equity
Equity Multiplier = $43,000 / $15,265 = 2.82
Such a person is the PROJECT SPONSOR. A project sponsor is the person with the overall accountability for a project, he has the responsibility to ensure that the project delivers the agreed business benefits. He is usually the one who is responsible for securing the financing and total resources project approval.
Answer:D
Explanation:
Is the relationship between total manufacturing costs and quantity of drink bottles economically plausible.
