Answer:
a. Acetyl CoA
Explanation:
Acetyl-CoA is produced in the mitochondria by the process of oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate and β-oxidation of the fatty acids.
However, <u>both acetyl CoA and Oxaloacetate cannot cross mitochondrial membrane.</u> But the two join together to form citrate and thus, citrate can cross the mitochondrial membrane.
The main components are the blood cells such as white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets. The other components represent additional information about these cells including their size, color, function, and maturity.
A patient has been brought to the hospital after suffering injuries from a fall at a construction site. He needs complete parenteral nourishment since he has nerve damage that has rendered his gag reflex ineffective. Which nerve should the nurse think the client's injury may have been caused by?
What is parenteral nourishment?
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a feeding technique that omits the digestive system. The majority of the body's nutritional requirements are met by a specific formula administered intravenously. When a person cannot or shouldn't receive feedings or fluids orally, the technique is utilized.
A patient has been brought to the hospital after suffering injuries from a fall at a construction site. He needs complete parenteral nourishment since he has nerve damage that has rendered his gag reflex ineffective. Clients' injury can be caused by Glossopharyngeal (IX).
To learn more about parenteral nourishment, click on the link below –
brainly.com/question/14257529
#SPJ4
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
