well if im right it should be 20$.
Answer:
due to elimination
income will decrease by $526000
Explanation:
Given data
Sales = $1180000
Variable expenses = $654000
Fixed expenses = $620000
to find out
incremental effect on net income
solution
we know here total sale is $1180000 and Variable expenses is $654000
so contribution if the division is dropped is sales - Variable expenses
put these value
contribution = 1180000 - 654000
contribution = 526000
so we say that due to elimination
income will decrease by $526000
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is not necessary to have board-approved policies on environmental management as the only way to indicate that corporate social responsibility practices have become an insignificant factor in determining where multinational corporations conduct business.
Answer:
D. Corn is not used in the production of other goods.
Explanation:
D is the only option that can be an argument for the total value of the corn produced to be included as corn for the same year in the GDP.
This is due to the fact that only the final production is recorded in the GDP, this means that no goods are registered that are going to be part of other productive processes (generally raw materials) since double accounting would be incurred.
If for example, corn were part of another productive process and this productive process begins next year, that part of the corn used to produce that good would be included in the GDP of the year in which the product will be produced (the one that corn is used in the production).
This means that the lobbyist can only rely on option D (include all the value of corn for the year in which it was produced) if in this country the corn is not part of another productive process.
