hello there
Andrea's point is probably the answer you're looking for, however, you should keep in mind that many (most?) environmental laws are driven more by politics than by the available data. Scientists do research on any number of topics (environmental or not) that have implications for our society. We (scientists) like to think that policy makers take our data and results into consideration when drafting legislation, but I would say that in my experience this rarely happens. For one, there have rarely been any federal legislators who understand science. Even the few physicians who've gone into politics seem largely to fail to understand very basic tenets of science, or at least they don't often demonstrate it with their political actions. Leaving environmental issues, for example, if politicians took science into account, there would be no discussion in any school district in the country about whether or not evolution should be taught in schools, as there are simply *NO* scientists who are qualified to have an opinion who would suggest it shouldn't. Environmental issues are not really any different.
hope that helped bye
To accept all individuals and treat them equally.
Answer:
Correct answer is A. The Middle East
Explanation:
There are 14 members of OPEC and most of them located in Middle East, including United Arab Emirates and Libya. Qatar was member until 2018.
None of the countries from Europe are members of this organization.
The same thing is with Central Asia, while from South Africa we only have Angola.
It is interesting that some of the largest petroleum exporting countries are not members of this organization.
The answer is Mandate System. This is the system that used
to divide or to partition Southwest Asia between Great Britain and France
following WWI. This system was established for the reason to administer the
German and Ottoman empires World War Territories.
