A good conclusion in a research paper restates the hypothesis so that reader can see the value of argument which either defends or criticizes the hypothesis. If it's a long paper it's a good idea to restate the hypothesis in the conclusion. This reminds the user of the hypothesis and draws the paper together. It also revisits the hypothesis and can provide new insight into the hypothesis. Another reason for restating the hypothesis in the conclusion is to pose questions and open the door for future research.
Answer:
mark as brainiest please
Explanation:
Agricultural Activities
mining
urbanisation
illegal longing
forest fires
Natural causes as hurricanes, fires, parasites and floods.
Answer:
Is the benefit worth the cost?
Explanation:
Environmental policies application has to lead to some economic cost.
When coming up with this policies, the effect that this policies shall have towards environmental protection shall be considered.
The cost and economic effect that this policies shall cause should also be looked at.
If a policy causes insignificant change towards environmental protection and at the same time the costs are too high, then the policy should be dropped.
If a policy has got significant impact and costs less, the it should be taken.
Bacteria, archaea, plants, protists, animals, and fungi, can use cellular respiration.
And the main ones that use celluar respiration are autotrophs and heterotrophs.
Hope I helped you out (:
Graphite is well known to be pencil lead - You might actually learn this in Chemistry/Physical Science like we did!
Charcoal & coal you cannot use - you could but it'd be difficult and irritating.
Fullerene is the third form of carbon. It can be used for electronics AND medicine. Amazing right??
