One way the President checks judicial power is through his ability to appoint federal judges. Since the President is the Chief Administrator, it's his job to appoint court of appeals judges, district court judges, and Supreme Court justices.
Answer:
The naturalistic methodological approach is sometimes rejected in the field of psychology on the basis that psychological events possess attributes that do not exist in purely natural events. One of the characteristics of the psychological is its intentionality. Starting from the distinction between the basic psychological processes and the behavioral products that emerge from them, it is proposed that the former constitute a proper field of natural science but that: nevertheless, they lead to the generation of theories capable of explaining intentional behavior.
Psychology is the study of individual behavior, that is, it is the investigation of processes that occur in the individual, such as perception or learning. In psychology, therefore, you should necessarily focus on possibly universal processes
natural science methods and goals are probably not useful for studying people and social behavior; Instead of explaining to people and society, research should aim at understanding human behavior ... In this vision, the most interesting questions are not about the "reality of the world, but about people's interpretations of it.
Intentional behavior, such as contingencies of reinforcement, educational experience or the current social context, we can see that a “causal” approach cannot easily be rejected. For example, we can see that a behavior now occurs because in the past it was followed by certain consequences. However, even recognizing the presence of such causes, the interpretationist researcher will insist that they influence the behavior only to the extent that they have any meaning for the individual and according to the intentions and motives that he harbors (and hence the same "causes" influence different individuals differently). Ultimately, then, the most important factors lie in these meanings, intentions and motives.
The answer is "On several occasions" because it gives an example of its hunting skills afterwards
I really wish you provided the research study. I would be happy to answer. It should be attached to wherever you found this question. Hope this helps :)
He didnt think the US should tie themselves to any European power.
issues could come about if England wanted to get involved in any territories.
if they sided with one Britian it Would be directly hypocritical of their practice and staement about being free from European affairs being seperate entities.it would go against their statement of being independent from foreign affairs
