I believe the answer is A) Staling and D) Preventing
The adversarial system or adversary system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth and pass judgment accordingly.[1][2][3] It is in contrast to the inquisitorial system used in some civil law systems (i.e. those deriving from Roman law or the Napoleonic code) where a judge investigates the case.
The adversarial system is the two-sided structure under which criminal trial courts operate, putting the prosecution against the defense.
<h2><em><u>please</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>mark</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>in</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>brain</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>list</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h2>
The restriction of the arbitrary exercise of power by subordinating it to well-defined and established laws.
Madame Bovary, the novel was written by Gustave Flaubert.
In the depiction of bourgeois spirituality, especially in the investigation of all the psychological nuances of his title character, Mrs. Bovary is considered both of the most important masterpieces of realism and the work that established the realist movement on the European stage. I am.
Flaubert received a fan letter from a Normandy woman when "Madame Bovary" first appeared in the series in 1856. "This story is not fiction," she wrote. "This woman existed," he replied to a curious reader with the answer he gave. "'Madame Bovary' is nothing realistic about it.
Madame Bovary Syndrome is a phenomenon that occurs in various female protagonists of the 19th century. Based on Gustave Flaubert's novel Madame Bovary, the syndrome was defined by the French philosopher Jules de Gaultier as a chronic emotional dissatisfaction with his life.
Learn more about Madame Bovary here: brainly.com/question/20875707
#SPJ4
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"
