Three little piggy's, what are you asking?
I would answer with C. because it is stating that students should have a more low-carb high-vegetable base meal plan in school lunches. This fits the negative tone of the sentence and agrees with it, so this would be the answer.
A. could technically be correct, but it does not flow with the tone of the sentence, as it has a negative connotation
B. Doesn’t have anything to do with the topic sentence, obviously elimination.
D. also doesn’t have anything to do with the topic sentence. Wrong because there is nothing mentioned about meat or organic foods.
Her endless diary entries
Let's write complete sentences using the given words:
1. Van Gogh's paintings are almost as expensive as the work of Picasso.
2. We did not know the Recycled Orchestra until we watched the video online yesterday.
For the first sentence, we can see that the purpose is to compare the work of two painters, Van Gogh and Picasso. That is why we use the structure "as ... as". We must place the adjective "expensive" in the middle: "almost as expensive as".
For the second sentence, we do not need to add anything. However, because of the word "yesterday", we know the sentence refers to something that happened in the past. Thus, we use the Simple Past tense for the verbs: not know - did not know; watch - watched.
In conclusion, all we need to do is read the words to grasp what the purpose of each sentence is and then add or change whatever is necessary to form a complete sentence.
Learn more about the Simple Past tense here:
brainly.com/question/14025107?referrer=searchResults