Answer: ask yourself one question each day
Y = -9x +6 / 3 m=-9/3 = -3
Writers often write stories or fictions from any perspective of their choice. The writer's main claim or thesis in the new version of the passage is Da Vinci was a great artist because he had exotropia.
Exotropia is a medical condition where there is an outward turning of the eyes.
It is known to be a very common type of strabismus often holding up to 25 percent of all ocular misalignment in early childhood.
People with this condition often notice their vision then becomes blurry or they have double vision when their eye points outward .
The options to the question is below
Which of the following is most likely the main claim that the writer is planning to make in the new version of the passage?
A The only way for an artist to be successful is to have exotropia.
B. Da Vinci was more successful as an artist than others who also had exotropia.
C. Studying just a few works of art can provide compelling information about an artist’s physical conditions.
D. The only way to fully understand an artist’s work is to study the artist’s physical conditions.
E. Da Vinci was a great artist because he had exotropia
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/25222246
Answer:
45 J
Explanation:
Work done = force × displacement
(<em>displacement</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>shortest</em><em> </em><em>distance</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>object</em><em> </em><em>travels</em><em> </em><em>when</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>force</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>applied</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em>)</em>
W = 15 × 3
= 45 J
[Note: While using the formulae, all quantities must be in their SI units.]
<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
