Can you add a picture please? You might want to redo this question with a picture of the graph or whatever is shown with the given information
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. The full question read;
Which detail belongs in the causes area of the web?
a) Trucks were initially sent to the wrong location.
b) Families lost each other in the panic.
c) The city rebuilt much of what was destroyed.
d) Many people lost their businesses and livelihoods.
Answer:
<u>b) Families lost each other in the panic.</u>
Explanation:
Indeed, historical records show that the 1871 Great Chicago fire had devastating effects on families. Sadly, it is estimated that at least 300 people died from that disaster.
Hence, the detail that belongs in the effects area of the web is that families lost each other in the panic, which brought deep emotional wounds for years to come.
a. Helen is frustrated by the challenges associated with learning to communicate.
The answer is C. Weedon always makes sure White Fang is fed
Weedon offers White Fang meat when they are introduced. Although White Fang does not take the meat directly from Weedon's hand at first. He eventually starts to eat out of his hand and their bond strengthened. So the answer is C.
Hope this helped. Have a great day!
Answer: the answer that was here before me had a bunch of paragraphs
and turns out it was theres more information here lol but the last paragraphs i put in my own words hope this helpes also if theres something that bothers u with this answer plz comment down below so that i can fix it! thanks! and Peace!
so I checked this on a plagiarism site and its 31% plagiarized so i went to a paraphrasing site - https:// quillbot.com - just get rid of the space - so once i paraphrased it here i went back to the plagiarism checker and it said zero percent plagiarized, i recommend doing this before getting a bad grade, also u dont have to change the topic but it would most likely be safer
also is ur looking for a plagiarism checker don't to Grammarly takes to long lol
ok also also - here's for example the same exact paragraph just with a changed topic and phrased differently -
My peers and I debated whether schools should have healthier lunches or not. We had several different viewpoints and views on the subject in our debate. By gathering background research on the subject, I prepared for this discussion. We had debates between my party. Not all of us were in agreement with each other. I listed several factual pieces of evidence that led to my point of view: I agree that on a daily basis, schools should have healthier lunches. - Healthier lunches means healthier kids - according to an online source. Not only would it be necessary to eat healthier but it would also keep children more focused in school.
I shared with my peers this truth. Many did not agree with me, however. We remained on the topic and discussed each other politely. In order to support my opinion, I found that I needed a good understanding of the subject and background study. Overall, with my fellow peers, this was a
very efficient debate. I enjoyed discussing my experience and my opinion and describing it. As we concentrated, I felt that I was profoundly connected to my peers. I talked animatedly as I explained my reasoning. I needed their attention to be drawn. My peers and I had a fruitful debate, as you can see.
Also this paragraph is posted by muah XR - so this is just an example, remember to rephrase it and put it in your own words and to change the topic thanks!
