Croen's argument that he is older and wiser than his son is an example of ethos.
Ethos is when an argument is constructed based on the ethics or credibility of the person that is making an argument. Ethos is in contrast to pathos, which appeals to emotions. Logos appears to logic or reason. Harmatia is something completely different and means when a fatal flaw leads to the downfall of a tragic hero.
Answer:
Practically the entirety of the cases that the Supreme Court hears are cases that are on allure. The Supreme Court has unique purview over a not many cases, however these are very uncommon. This implies that the Supreme Court is quite often hearing situations where just matters of law are at issue (instead of issues of certainty). The Supreme Court is essentially, in those cases, attempting to choose if the law (regardless of whether rule law or the Constitution) has been effectively applied.
Explanation:
Cases heard by the Supreme Court for the most part include significant and troublesome issues of law. Cases that are not significant, or where the law is self evident, don't make it as far as possible up the stepping stool to the Supreme Court.
Thus, the cases the Court hears are those that include significant and troublesome inquiries of law. It hears those cases either after they have come up through the government court framework or after they have been chosen by the high court of a state.
I think it’s D. Because it makes sense because the judicial branch is local.
The policy being described is known as New Federalism.
This political ideology implemented by Richard Nixon was developed with the goal of giving states back more power. Nixon felt that the federal government had become too large in scope thanks to policies like the New Deal during the 1930's. In order to change this cycle, Nixon implemented this new federalism idea so that states can have more control over funds that would be used towards solving social issues.
