All categories

3 years ago

Which circle is the graph of the equation (x-4)2+(y-3)2=4? gradpoint

Mathematics

1 answer:

Rainbow [258]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The center-radius form of the circle equation is in the format (x – h)2 + (y – k)2 = r2, with the center being at the point (h, k) and the radius being "r". This form of the equation is helpful, since you can easily find the center and the radius.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps you :)

You might be interested in

What is the linear equation for this graph? (y=mx+b)

mart [117]

Answer:

y = -3x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

the y-intercept is -3 as shown in the graph, so, b = -3

if you count, the rise is 3 and the run is -1, so the slope will be -3/1

-3/1 equals to -3

y = -3x - 3

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELP !!!! I'm stuck

irina [24]

The answer is c not D you are welcome

4 0

3 years ago

Based on the Nielsen ratings, the local CBS affiliate claims its 11:00 PM newscast reaches 41 % of the viewing audience in the a

ZanzabumX [31]

Answer:

1) Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.41$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.41$

2) $\hat p=0.36$ estimated proportion of people indicated that they watch the late evening news on this local CBS station

3) $z_{crit}=-2.33$

And we can use the following excel code to find it: "=NORM.INV(0.01,0,1)"

4) $z=\frac{0.36 -0.41}{\sqrt{\frac{0.41(1-0.41)}{1000}}}=-1.017$

5) $z_{crit}=-1.28$

And we can use the following excel code to find it: "=NORM.INV(0.1,0,1)"

6) We see that $|t_{calculated}|$ so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance.

7) Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.41$

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=100 represent the random sample taken

X represent the people indicated that they watch the late evening news on this local CBS station

$\hat p=0.36$ estimated proportion of people indicated that they watch the late evening news on this local CBS station

$p_o=0.41$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v{/tex} represent the p value (variable of interest) Part 1We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that 11:00 PM newscast reaches 41 % of the viewing audience in the area: Null hypothesis:[tex]p\geq 0.41$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.41$

Part 2

$\hat p=0.36$ estimated proportion of people indicated that they watch the late evening news on this local CBS station

Part 3

Since we have a left tailed test we need to see in the normal standard distribution a value that accumulates 0.01 of the area on the left and on this case this value is :

$z_{crit}=-2.33$

And we can use the following excel code to find it: "=NORM.INV(0.01,0,1)"

Part 4

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.36 -0.41}{\sqrt{\frac{0.41(1-0.41)}{1000}}}=-1.017$

Part 5

Since we have a left tailed test we need to see in the normal standard distribution a value that accumulates 0.1 of the area on the left and on this case this value is :

$z_{crit}=-1.28$

And we can use the following excel code to find it: "=NORM.INV(0.1,0,1)"

Part 6

We see that $|t_{calculated}|$ so then we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance.

Part 7

Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.41$

4 0

3 years ago

This is due today, please help!!! I will give brainliest.

WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

Step 1, all the exponents are increased by 4

Step-by-step explanation:

The first incorrect step occurred in Step 1, where all the exponents were increased by 4.

This is mathematically incorrect due to exponential rules. When distributing exponents inside parentheses, we have to multiply the existing exponents inside the parentheses by the exponent outside the parentheses.

For example, (x²)³ is not x²⁺³, but rather, x⁽²⁾⁽³⁾.

We multiply the exponents instead of adding them together.

Therefore, the correct Step 1 should multiply all the variables' exponents by 4.

Steps 2 and 3 are correct since we do add the exponents when multiplying exponents with the same base, and we do subtract exponents with the same base when dividing.

6 0

3 years ago

Another one please help

n200080 [17]

-- The area of the long skinny piece on top is (6 x 33) = 198

-- The length of the dotted line between the top and bottom pieces is (33-21) = 12

-- The area of the bottom piece is (12 x 15) = 180

-- The area of the whole thing is (198 + 180) = 378

-- The perimeter of the whole thing is (33 + 6 + 21 + 15 + 12 + 15 + 6) = 108

6 0

3 years ago