Answer:
C.)The carnival entertainers kept the audience engaged with wild and crazy events.
Explanation:
A.)The town had never before hosted a traveling carnival before that night.
B.)The audience knows that the carnival is not real so that makes them excited.
C.)The carnival entertainers kept the audience engaged with wild and crazy events.
D.)The carnival is the only place that an audience can feel tension and excitement.
This question refers to the story "An Unexplainable Occurrence" by Elizabeth Kibler. One of the reasons why the setting of the carnival influences the tension and excitement that the narrator feels is because the carnival is extremely lively and wild. The narrator tells us that the trapeze artist swung perilously from the tent and that the ringmaster's whip splinter the air. The excitement that the narrator feels is conveyed to the reader through the effective use of language.
I believe the answer is A because he says "I was fearful of losing a bargain."
The reasoning in the argument Tinker v Des Moines is that:
- In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 this was known to be a (1969) case where the Supreme Court was said to have ruled that public school officials are people who are not permitted to censor student expression only if they have the ability to make a reasonable forecast that the speech will lead to a kind of disrupt school activities or encroach on the rights of others.
<h3>Which group has the stronger argument?</h3>
Tinker had the stronger argument. This is because they were able to prove that the wearing of the band did not in any way disrupt school activities.
<h3>What was the dissent in Tinker v Des Moines?</h3>
The dissent is one who have argued that the First Amendment is a law that do not in any way grant the right to show off any opinion at any time.
Hence, since Students attend school to learn, not teach. The armbands was regarded as a form of a distraction.
Therefore, In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 this was known to be a (1969) case where the Supreme Court was said to have ruled that public school officials are people who are not permitted to censor student expression only if they have the ability to make a reasonable forecast that the speech will lead to a kind of disrupt school activities or encroach on the rights of others.
Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moine from
brainly.com/question/17535866
#SPJ1
The answer is dictatorship
