Answer:
Minutia such as this isn't worth the verbiage that is being devoted to it.
Explanation:
Not everything that might have an adverse effect is intentionally done. What we have here is over-concern, or hyper-concern, on the part of people who are looking for some way to shine with politically correct glory, forever trying to sniff out something that they can blame someone else for, even it that might be not trying hard enough to be progressive.
Quit it, already. Remember: get woke, go broke. On the other hand, if poverty is your thing, and joining the poor is what you want to do, go for it.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Casey eats a lot of junk food. She knows the negative consequences of her diet but rationalizes her behavior by saying the junk food helps her deal with her anxiety. Casey is using this explanation because she is uncomfortable with the inconsistency between her actions and her beliefs and wants to reduce cognitive dissonance.
This term refers to a state that involves conflicting attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs. People generate a sense of mental distress leading to a change of attitudes and behaviors in order to reduce the discomfort and recover stability. That is what is happening to Casey and the contradictions in her behavior.
Answer:
Problems that are seen in population management of Nepal : There is low literacy rate in Nepal and male population is more than females in Nepal. Early marriages is also a factor that is affecting population management in Nepal. Lack of family planning is also a reason behind population increase in Nepal.
Your reading above gets my article completely backwards. The research shows that women who work outside the home have LOWER rates of depression than those who do not, even when we control for other factors, like pre-existing health problems that might make some women less likely to work. Someone needs a better fact checker or copy-editor!
